تناقضات لوح شجره اوروک

است بعد از او دوباره داریوش اول هخامنشی شاه بابل شد نه داریوش سوم بعد از او هم اراخی یا الکسی قیام کرد
Immediately, Darius advanced against the rebel. The Babylonians were unable to prevent the Persians from crossing the Tigris, and on 13 December, their army was defeated. Five days later, a second battle took place near Zâzâna on the Euphrates; again, Darius' army was victorious. Nidintu-Bêl was killed when Darius took Babylon. (The Greek researcher Herodotus [c.480-c.429] coects the siege of Babylon with the story of Zopyrus.)
This was not the end of the rebellious feelings. When Darius was in Media to wage war upon the rebel king Phraortes, a second rebellion took place in Babylonia, led byArakha, whose throne name was Nebuchadnezzar IV. Darius' general Intaphrenes took care of it in 521.
اراخا ر= ل خ= x
اراخا = الکسا

تفاقا دیودور هم خاندان مقدونی را از اعقاب اشور در همان حوالی ارمنستان بزرگ ادرس داده است

جالب ان که این از موارد خاصی است که دو کتیبه یعنی سند دست اول کاملا با هم مطابقت دارند و مترجم لوح به مقتضی تعصبات شخصی هیچ توجهی به این همه سند ندارد که ندارد .

(49) King Darius says: While I was in Persia and in Media, the Babylonians revolted from me a second time. A certain man named Arakha, an Armenian, son of Haldita, rebelled in Babylon. At a place called Dubâla, he lied unto the people, saying: 'I am Nebuchadnezzar, the son of Nabonidus.' Then did the Babylonian people revolt from me and they went over to that Arakha. He seized Babylon, he became king in Babylon.

پرنیان حامد